Review: ESV Expository Commentary, Volume 9 (John–Acts)

There are three things I reach for more than anything else in the study — my coffee, my Bible, and a commentary. As someone whose daily rhythm is significantly shaped by study, preaching, and teaching, commentaries have become essential companions. They are also notably one area of my library that I have not fully moved to digital. Over the past several months, I have been downsizing my book collection (more than 600 volumes have left my shelves in recent weeks, with more to follow). While I am learning to be more selective about what I read and even more selective about what I keep, commentaries remain in a category of their own. Some have been replaced by my growing Logos library, but commentaries are companions, and I have not been fully willing to surrender that relationship to a screen (Some books are meant to be held).

Whether I am preparing a message for the chapel at Water Street Mission, leading a class at River Corner Church, or pressing through my doctoral studies at Kairos University, I find myself consulting these resources almost as often as the Scriptures themselves. Recently, I had the opportunity to spend significant time with new volumes from Crossway’s ESV Expository Commentary series — first Volume 8 (Matthew–Luke), and now Volume 9: John–Acts. Having already reviewed Volume 8, I found Volume 9 worthy of its own treatment.

Meeting the Authors of ESV Expository Commentary Volume 9

I’ll be honest: when I first picked up this volume, I noticed that I didn’t recognize either contributor — James M. Hamilton Jr. (John) or Brian J. Vickers (Acts). I am sure that these are names well-regarded in Southern Baptist Church circles, but they don’t appear with the same frequency in the broader Evangelical commentary landscape alongside figures like F.F. Bruce, Craig Keener, or Gary M. Burge. That unfamiliarity gave me a moment’s pause — not to diminish their scholarship, but simply because I tend to gravitate toward commentators whose theological range and institutional diversity I already know.

Hamilton holds a Th.M. from Dallas Theological Seminary and a Ph.D. from The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, where he now teaches. Interestingly, much of his published work has been in Old Testament studies, though he brings a strong typological lens to his reading of John, which, as I’ll discuss, shapes his interpretive approach in notable ways. Vickers, also at Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, serves as a professor of New Testament Interpretation. His M.Div. and Ph.D. are likewise from SBTS, and he holds an M.A. from Wheaton College. So, both come from good theological pedigrees and a conservative viewpoint, though probably a little more Fundamentalist than my own stream.

Both men are serious scholars. My one honest reservation about this volume is that both contributors emerge from the same institution and, consequently, bring a relatively unified theological perspective. I make a habit of reading commentaries across paradigms — critical and academic, devotional and practical, Reformed and Wesleyan, Anabaptist and general evangelical. That breadth is what I consider good theological practice. This volume is decidedly Reformed in its orientation, and readers should enter with that awareness. It’s unavoidable, but not to the point of ignoring its credibility and offerings. Such a lens does not create friction for me in my actual use of it — and in practice, that awareness is simply part of responsible engagement with any resource.

Content and Theological Depth

I worked through the commentary on John with considerable thoroughness. Acts I have not yet covered as completely, so most of my comments here center on Hamilton’s treatment of John.

What I found was genuinely impressive. This is a theologically serious, verse-by-verse exposition that moves carefully through each passage. The format follows a consistent and helpful structure: a section overview, an outline, verse-by-verse exegesis, and then a movement toward contemporary application — how the text encounters us in our churches, our faith lives, and the places we live, work, and play. That rhythm serves both the preacher and the serious student well.

Hamilton makes an interesting interpretive claim — that the Gospel of John reflects John’s self-understanding as a biblical theologian. I am hesitant to make such a claim, and I tend to value that the community surrounding John played a role in shaping and transmitting the Gospel’s material. Whether one fully accepts that framework or not, it is a coherent interpretive lens, and Hamilton holds it consistently throughout.

One notable characteristic of this commentary is its focus. Unlike William Barclay or the Interpreter’s Bible Commentary — which frequently draw on secondary sources, cultural anecdotes, and illustrative stories — Hamilton stays tightly focused on the text itself. There is relatively little in the way of tangential material. For pastors and teachers working under time pressure, that disciplined focus is a genuine asset.

As I worked through a vew passages, I put it to the test in direct comparison. Preparing to preach on John 9 — Jesus, the man born blind, and the peculiar business of mud and saliva — I worked through this commentary alongside F.F. Bruce, R.C. Sproul, Craig Keener, Gary M. Burge’s NIV Application Commentary, John H. Sailhammer, and Barclay. Hamilton’s treatment covered as much substantive ground as two or three of those other sources combined, and did so in prose that was markedly more accessible. It more than held its own.

Design and Physical Quality

Yes, a commentary’s value lives in its content, but its accessibility is often determined by its physical design. In this series, Crossway has done something that not every publisher bothers to get right. In fact, I hope that the success of this series inspires other publishers to simply do better at design and readability.
The exterior is simple and distinguished — a black hardcover with gold lettering and trim. It looks exactly like what it is: a serious, lasting reference work. But it is the interior that earns my real appreciation. In an era when many academic publications pack dense text into small fonts across cramped pages, Crossway has made genuinely reader-friendly choices. The font appears to be approximately 12-point — comfortable for long reading sessions without eye fatigue. White space is generous, and the margins are wide enough for notes, though I tend not to mark up my commentaries.

Two details stand out for the kind of work I do: the paper is notably thick and high-quality, and the volume lays flat when open. That second point may seem minor, but for anyone regularly working with four or five books open simultaneously, a volume that stays open on its own is not a small thing — it is a meaningful practical feature. These books also simply look excellent on a shelf. Uniform, clean, scholarly in appearance without being intimidating.

Who Will Benefit Most

While this commentary is accessible to a range of readers — from serious students to lay teachers — its design and approach are best suited to pastors and preachers. The writing avoids unnecessary technical jargon without sacrificing theological weight. It engages cultural and social context in ways that illuminate the text for contemporary audiences. And its consistent structure makes it efficient to navigate under the kind of time pressure that pastoral ministry typically involves.

For those who, like me, read across theological traditions, this volume works best when placed in conversation with commentators from other streams. It is not designed to be a sole source, and it doesn’t need to be. What it does, it does with clarity, depth, and pastoral instinct.

Final Assessment

The ESV Expository Commentary, Volume 9: John–Acts has already found a regular place in my rotation. Volumes 8 and 9 are quickly becoming some of my most-used commentary resources. My thanks to Crossway for placing this on my shelf — and for producing a series that takes both the theological substance and the physical craft of a well-made commentary seriously. This one is worth keeping.

Buy on Crossway

If this post resonated, subscribe for future reflections, share it with a friend, or leave a comment. You can learn more about his journey to recover a rooted Christian way of life through the Lord’s Prayer, ancient habits, leading a quiet life, and simple Jesus communities online at JeffMcLain.com, the Lead a Quiet Life blog on Patheos, or the Discovering God Podcast.